Validation of the Dépistage Cognitif de Québec in the Oldest Old

Amélie Gravel, MD1,2, Carol Hudon, PhD3, Synthia Meilleur-Durand, MD1,2, Leila Sellami, MD1,2, David Bergeron, MD, PhD1,2, Audrey Paradis, MSc1,2, Louis Verret, MD1,2, Marie-Pierre Fortin, MD1,2, Stéphane Poulin, MD1,2, Joël Macoir, PhD4,5, Rémi W. Bouchard, MD1,2, Robert Laforce, MD, PhD1,2

1Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME), Département des Sciences Neurologiques, CHU de Québec, Quebec City, QC
2Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC
3École de psychologie, Université Laval and Centre de recherche du CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC
4Département de Réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval
5Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Québec, Quebec City, QC, Canada



We aimed to validate the Dépistage Cognitif de Québec (DCQ;, a new cognitive screening tool for atypical degenerative syndromes, in the oldest old.


The DCQ was developed by expert behavioural neurologists and clinical neuropsychologists based on updated criteria for Alzheimer’s disease, primary progressive aphasia, and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. It targets five relevant cognitive domains: Memory, Visuospatial, Executive, Language, and Behaviour. Validation was performed using a prospective community-based sample consisting of 53 healthy French-speaking Canadian volunteers aged between 80 and 94 years old. Normative data were derived from participants with no history of cognitive difficulties and a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 24.


The mean DCQ total score (out of 100) was 84.65 (SD = 6.33). Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed a moderate, but significant, correlation (r = 0.36, p < .01) with the MoCA. Normative data shown in percentiles were stratified by age and education for DCQ total score and for each of the five cognitive domains.


This study suggests that the DCQ is a valid cognitive screening test in the oldest old. It is proposed that the DCQ can help early identification of atypical degenerative syndromes.

Key words: aging, dementia, oldest old, Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, atypical dementia, validation, normative data, test construction


Dramatic increase in dementia prevalence(1) has made cognitive screening highly valuable for early detection of cognitive impairment.(2) According to the WHO, the population living with dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease, has reached 47.5 millions worldwide.(3) Screening tests, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE),(4) the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA),(5) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised,(6) have served as the main instruments used in clinical practice. Other tests have been developed to assess specific cognitive domains, such as the Sydney Language Battery(7) for the assessment of language skills, and the DAPHNE (Disinhibition, Apathy, Perseverations, Hyperorality, personal Neglect and loss of Empathy) which focuses on the assessment of behavioural symptoms in the behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD).(8)

Unfortunately, a number of shortcomings have been reported with screening instruments.(911) Moreover, dementia classifications have flourished, with several updated diagnostic criteria published in 2011. For example, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been reconceptualized as a spectrum with distinct clinical phenotypes (i.e., amnestic, visual, language, and frontal/dysexecutive variants).(12) The Primary Progressive Aphasias (PPA) have been classified into three main subtypes (i.e., non-fluent/agrammatic, semantic, and logopenic),(13) and improved criteria for the diagnosis of bvFTD have been published.(14) None of the major cognitive screening tests currently available have kept pace with these clinical and nosological changes. In addition, none have integrated behavioural aspects of dementia in their screening format, making them less relevant for the detection of atypical presentations of AD, PPA or the frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) spectrum.

The Dépistage Cognitif de Québec (DCQ;, is a newly developed cognitive screening test(15) based on updated diagnostic criteria for AD, PPA, and the FTLD spectrum. The DCQ was recently validated in a large adult population (n = 410 participants) aged between 50 and 89 years old,(15) and we also demonstrated its superiority over the MoCA in detecting atypical dementia in a cohort of 195 patients.(16) However, the oldest old were largely under-represented in our previous studies, as they comprised only about 10% of the normative sample.

We aimed to validate the DCQ in the oldest old, that is, in a cohort of cognitively healthy French-speaking Canadians aged 80 and above. Similar to our previous work, we hoped the DCQ would allow better detection of typical and atypical presentations of dementia, and address limitations of the current cognitive screening tools available.



We prospectively recruited cognitively healthy French-speaking Canadians aged 80 years and older via public advertisements and/or patients’ relatives. This study was approved by the local Ethics Review Committee and all participants provided written informed consent. Subjects were excluded if they reported a history of traumatic brain injury, delirium, brain surgery, neurological disease (e.g., multiple sclerosis, stroke), encephalitis or meningitis, an untreated metabolic, psychiatric illness, brain oncological therapy, active alcohol and drug abuse, disabling visual and hearing disorders, experimental therapy, incapacity and illiteracy or if they obtained a MoCA score < 24. A total of 53 community-dwelling individuals with a MoCA ≥ 24 took part in this validation study. While a MOCA score of ≥ 26 was suggested as the cut-off to identify ‘normal’ from ‘impaired’ in the initial validation study,(5) it has been suggested by several researchers that this cut-off is too stringent and often leads to exclusion by misclassification of 50% of the sample.(1719) In order to enhance inclusion of the oldest old in our normative study, we set a MoCA cut-off ≥ 24, which is in line with a large normative study for the MoCA in elderly Quebec-French population.(20) Participants had no cognitive complaints and preserved activities of daily living according to both self-report and brief interview with a significant other who spent over 25 hours/week with the participant.

Materials and Procedure

The DCQ test ( was developed at La Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME) of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, the oldest tertiary Memory Clinic in Canada, by a group of experienced behavioural neurologists, clinical neuropsychologists, and a speech language pathologist (RL, LV, RB, SP, MH, MPF, MR, JM, CH). It targets five relevant cognitive domains: Memory, Visuospatial, Executive, Language, and Behaviour (see Figure 1) through five specific indexes. The Memory Index (out of 30) comprises an eight-word recall/recognition task in immediate and delayed format administered using the Dubois paradigm. The Visuospatial Index (out of 7) tests visual recognition of overlapping figures, as well as spatial rotation (see Figure 1). This test also includes a geometric figure-drawing test. The Executive Index (out of 10) includes backward digit span, months backward, an alternating graphic sequence test, a two-item verbal abstraction task, phonemic fluency (letter A, 60 sec) and a modified Stroop test. The Language Index (out of 33) comprises a scene description task for assessing spontaneous speech, naming and single-word writing tasks, a multi-sentence writing test, an assessment of comprehension with a sentence–picture matching test, a semantic verbal fluency task, and a task requiring the participant to repeat sentences of various lengths and complexity. Finally, the Behavioural Index (out of 20) explores 10 domains (depression, anxiety, delusions, hallucinations, irritability and aggression, apathy, disinhibition and impaired judgment, perseverations and compulsions, loss of empathy/sympathy, and self-criticism) as reported by a significant other.



FIGURE 1 Illustrative summary of the subtests composing the five DCQ indexes

All participants completed both the DCQ (25–30 min) and the MoCA in a random order, on the same day. These tests were administered by trained psychometricians. The Behavioural Index was completed face to face or by telephone with a significant other who spent over 25 hours/week with the participant.

Statistical Analysis

Basic descriptive analyses, including means and standard deviations, were performed. Validity was established through correlations between DCQ total score (out of 100) and MoCA total score (out of 30), using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 24.0) with the alpha level set at 0.05.



Demographics are presented in Table 1. Mean age was 84.3 yrs (SD = 3.49). There were more men than women (62.3% vs. 37.7%). The average number of years of education was 12.9 (SD = 3.9). Mean MoCA total score was 25.93 (SD = 1.63), while mean DCQ total score was 84.65 (SD = 6.33). There was no difference in the DCQ total score between males (84.05, SD = 7.00) and females (85.63, SD = 5.09). Correlation between age and DCQ total score was not statistically significant (r = −0.23, p < .1), but the total DCQ score was significantly correlated with education (r = 0.48, p < .01).

TABLE 1 Demographics data: normative sample (N=53)


Normative Data

Scores for the DCQ were stratified according to the number of years of education (≤ 12 and >12 years) to provide normative tables. Table 2 presents the percentile ranks for total DCQ score. For example, an 82-year-old man with 10 years of education who obtained a total score on the DCQ of 87/100 would be at the 75th percentile. Separate percentiles for each of the five DCQ indexes are provided in Table 3. Scores on the Behavioural Index were missing for one subject (non-availability of a significant other to answer the questionnaire; N = 52).

TABLE 2 Percentile norms for the DCQ total score


TABLE 3 Percentile norms for the five DCQ indexes


Validity and Reliability

Validity was assessed by correlating the DCQ total score with the MoCA total score. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was moderate but significant (r = 0.36, p < .01) (see Figure 2). The test was well-tolerated by the participants, and the behavioural questionnaire was easily understood by the significant other. Validity of DCQ test with existing screening instruments has been measured previously in our validation study, along with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, practice effect, and interrater reliability.(15)



FIGURE 2 Scatter plot illustrating the correlation between DCQ and MoCA total scores


In this study, we validated the DCQ on a subgroup of 53 cognitively healthy individuals aged ≥ 80 years old, hence providing clinicians with normative data for the oldest old on this test. This is a subgroup of elderly individuals for which there is often a paucity of normative data. Previous validation of the DCQ on 410 healthy individuals was lacking observations in individuals aged older than 80 years old (n = 29).(15) Given that the DCQ has already shown a superiority over the MoCA for the detection of atypical neurodegenerative diseases (AD variants, PPAs, and the FTLD spectrum),(16) we believe these normative data in the oldest old will help better detect such conditions in this subgroup of the population.

The five DCQ indexes were specifically designed to provide advanced information on specific cognitive domains. For example, the Language Index assesses semantic knowledge through confrontation naming and comprehension tasks. It also detects surface dyslexia/surface dysgraphia by testing the writing and spelling of irregular words. Such features are hallmarks of deficits found in the semantic variant of PPA. Other salient language deficits, such as poor word retrieval and impairment in the repetition of long and complex sentences, are seen in the logopenic variant of PPA, agrammatism in spoken and written production is seen in nfvPPA, as well as the rating of speech apraxia in spontaneous spoken production,(13) are also tested within this index. The Visuospatial Index includes subtests that explore visual orientation and spatial perception without the interference of executive and/or visuoconstructive skills. Failure to carry out cube drawing or clock drawing, for instance, may reflect combined executive and visuospatial impairments, preventing assessment of pure visuospatial impairment.(21) Following this rationale, the DCQ’s Visuospatial Index may allow for better screening of the deficits associated with the visual variant of AD (also known as Posterior Cortical Atrophy).(22) The Memory index includes immediate, delayed, and cued recall tasks using the Dubois paradigm.(23) This approach has proven more efficient to discriminate memory consolidation impairments associated with amnestic AD from other memory disorders. Finally, we believe that specific patterns of behavioural changes may help differentiate certain types of dementia, such as FTD.(24) The Behavioural Index was developed and integrated in the DCQ, and represents a great addition to standard cognitive screening measures. This index includes, among other items, the core behavioural features of bvFTD criteria.(14)

Similar to previous authors, we found that participants with greater years of education performed better than their less-educated counterparts. Normative values were developed accordingly. Similar impact of prior education on cognitive score was noted in other cognitive screening test such as the MMSE and the MoCA. Several studies across countries have shown that cognitive performance is influenced by sociodemographic variables such as age and education.(20,25) This is thought to explain as much as 49% of the variance in the MoCA.(26) In our study, there was no significant correlation between the DCQ total score and age. This contrasted with the findings of our initial validation study on individuals aged between 50 and 89 years old where the DCQ total score was significantly and inversely proportional to age.(15) One could hypothesize that the impact of age on cognition eventually reaches a plateau in the oldest old. This may also be due to small sample size.

This study has some limitations. First, power is limited by sample size, although this size compares with many recently published works. Also, there might be overrepresentation of highly educated subjects when we compare to recent Quebec demographics.(27) In addition, DCQ norms were derived using a francophone-based sample, and caution should be observed when using theses norms in culturally, ethnically, and linguistically diverse populations. English validation of the DCQ is currently completed (paper in preparation) and results are similar to the initial validation study.(15)


In conclusion, we validated and provided normative data for the DCQ in the oldest old. The DCQ is a new cognitive screening test which was developed based on the updated dementia criteria for AD variants, PPAs, and bvFTD, and which has been validated on 410 healthy individuals(15) and in a sample of 195 patients with atypical syndromes.(16) It has proven to be superior to the MoCA in detecting atypical dementias.(16) We are confident that this instrument will be useful to expand the cognitive tool kit in the clinical setting of a memory clinic. A multicenter joint Canadian (Montreal, Calgary, Toronto, Sherbrooke, New Brunswick, and Vancouver) and USA (California) effort to validate the English version of the DCQ is now completed (paper in preparation) and results are similar to the French version of the DCQ. Finally, in the investigative sequence of tests performed in a tertiary memory clinic, we position the DCQ as a complement to existing cognitive screening tests (see Figure 3). We propose that this test be used à la carte when MMSE and MoCA have fallen short of helping clinicians establish their differential diagnosis. The DCQ should be used to explore further a clinical suspicion that was unanswered by standard screening tests. This in turn may avoid exposing patients to unnecessarily lengthy neurocognitive assessment when not needed. As behavioural neurologists and clinical neuropsychologists ourselves, we suggest that comprehensive neuropsychological assessment be kept for patients with complex psychiatric comorbidities, highly educated young individuals, patients with mental retardation, or others suspected of malingering.



FIGURE 3 Positioning the DCQ amongst other cognitive screening measures


This work was supported by La Chaire de recherche sur les aphasies primaires progressives—Fondation de la Famille Lemaire, La Fondation du CHU de Québec, La Société Alzheimer de Québec, CIRTMC, and donations from la Famille Corriveau. The authors are grateful to the participants and their families for supporting our research.


The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.


1 Sosa-Ortiz AL, Acosta-Castillo I, Prince MJ. Epidemiology of dementias and Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Med Res. 2012; 43(8):600–08.
cross-ref  pubmed  

2 Yokomizo JE, Simon SS, de Campos Bottino CM. Cognitive screening for dementia in primary care: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(11):1783–804.
cross-ref  pubmed  

3 Prince M, Comas-Herrera A, Knapp M, et al. World Alzheimer report 2016: improving healthcare for people living with dementia: coverage, quality and costs now and in the future. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2016.

4 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state” a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.
cross-ref  pubmed  

5 Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–99.
cross-ref  pubmed  

6 Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, et al. The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21(11):1078–85.
cross-ref  pubmed  

7 Savage S, Hsieh S, Leslie F, et al. Distinguishing subtypes in primary progressive aphasia: application of the Sydney language battery. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;35(3–4):208–18.
cross-ref  pubmed  

8 Boutoleau-Bretonnière C, Evrard C, Hardouin JB, et al. DAPHNE: a new tool for the assessment of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2015;5(3):503–16.

9 Appels BA, Scherder E. The diagnostic accuracy of dementia-screening instruments with an administration time of 10 to 45 minutes for use in secondary care: a systematic review. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010;25(4):301–16.
cross-ref  pubmed  

10 Coen RF, Robertson DA, Kenny RA, et al. Strengths and limitations of the MoCA for assessing cognitive functioning: findings from a large representative sample of Irish older adults. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2016;29(1):18–24.

11 Votruba KL, Persad C, Giordani B. Cognitive deficits in healthy elderly population with “normal” scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2016; 29(3):126–32.
cross-ref  pubmed  

12 McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–69.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

13 Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011;76(11):1006–14.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

14 Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(9):2456–77.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

15 Laforce Jr R, Sellami L, Bergeron D, et al. Validation of the Dépistage Cognitif de Québec: a new cognitive screening tool for atypical dementias. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2018;33(1):57–65.

16 Sellami L, Meilleur-Durand S, Chouinard AM, et al. The Dépistage Cognitif de Québec: a new clinician’s tool for early recognition of atypical dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2018;46(5–6):310–21.

17 Larner AJ. Screening utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): in place of—or as well as—the MMSE? Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(3):391–96.

18 Malek-Ahmadi M, Powell JJ, Belden CM, et al. Age- and education-adjusted normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in older adults age 70–99. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015;22(6):755–61.

19 Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52(5):329–32.
cross-ref  pubmed  

20 Larouche E, Tremblay MP, Potvin O, et al. Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in middle-aged and elderly Quebec-French people. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016; 31(7):819–26.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

21 Moafmashhadi P, Koski L. Limitations for interpreting failure on individual subtests of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2013;26(1):19–28.
cross-ref  pubmed  

22 Crutch SJ, Lehmann M, Schott JM, et al. Posterior cortical atrophy. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(2):170–78.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

23 Dubois B, Touchon J, Portet F, et al. “The 5 words”: a simple and sensitive test for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Presse Med. 2002;31(36):1696–99.

24 Jenner C, Reali G, Puopolo M, et al. Can cognitive and behavioural disorders differentiate frontal variant-frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease at early stages? Behav Neurol. 2006;17(2):89–95.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

25 Ganguli M, Snitz BE, Lee C-W, et al. Age and education effects and norms on a cognitive test battery from a population-based cohort: the Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team. Aging Ment Health. 2010;14(1):100–07.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

26 Freitas S, Simões MR, Alves L, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): normative study for the Portuguese population. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011;33(9):989–96.
cross-ref  pubmed  

27 Institut de la Statistique du Québec. Répartition de la population de 15 ans et plus selon le niveau de scolarité, le sexe et le groupe d’âge, Québec, 2006. [cited 2019, August 18]. Quebec City, QC: Institut de la Statistique du Québec; 2006. Available from:

Correspondence to: Robert Laforce Jr., md, phd, Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Département des Sciences Neurologiques, CHU de Québec, 1401, 18ième rue Québec, Québec City, QC, G1J 1Z4 Canada, E-mail:

(Return to Top)

Canadian Geriatrics Journal, Vol. 23, No. 4, December 2020