Barriers to Assessing Fitness to Drive in Dementia in Nova Scotia: Informing Strategies for Knowledge Translation

Barriers to Assessing Fitness to Drive in Dementia in Nova Scotia: Informing Strategies for Knowledge Translation

Paige Moorhouse , MD, MPH 1,2, Laura Hamilton , BSc 1, Tracey Fisher , BSc 1, Kenneth Rockwood , MD 1,2

1 Geriatric Medicine Research, Capital District Health Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
2 Division of Geriatric Medicine, Capital District Health Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS

DOI: 10.5770/cgj.v14i3.7

ABSTRACT

Background and Purpose

Over half a million Canadians have a diagnosis of dementia, approximately 25–30% of whom continue to drive. Individuals with dementia have a risk of motor vehicle collision up to eight times that of drivers without dementia. In Nova Scotia, the responsibility of reporting unsafe drivers is discretionary, but national survey data indicate that many physicians do not feel comfortable assessing driving safety. We report on barriers to addressing driving safety as identified by Nova Scotian primary care physicians (PCPs).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of surveys completed by 134 English-speaking, Nova Scotian PCPs (mean years of practice 17.9±11; 53% female; 58% urban). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and multivariate linear and logistic regression (controlling for sex, urban/rural, and years of practice).

Results

Most PCPs (96%) routinely address driving safety in dementia, but physicians at all levels of experience find these discussions uncomfortable and sometimes avoid them. PCPs experience multiple barriers to assessing driving in dementia and desire further education and resources.

Conclusions

In Nova Scotia, driving assessment is considered part of routine care in dementia, but general lack of comfort in administering these assessments is a risk. To improve physician comfort further education and resources are required.

Key words: dementia , driving assessment , primary care

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias cause impairment in functional abilities, including ability to drive.(13) Over half a million individuals in Canada have a diagnosis of AD,(4) and in Nova Scotia, approximately 5,400 individuals with a diagnosis of AD continue to drive.(45) Following a diagnosis of AD, almost 50% of individuals will be involved in a motor vehicle collision (MVC) within five years.(6)

AD affects driving by reducing reaction time(1) and the ability to shift visual attention from one stimulus to another(2)—for example, from a car in front of the vehicle to a pedestrian crossing the street. Early loss of insight(7) may prevent individuals with AD from accurately appraising their driving abilities and foster optimistic bias, the idea that bad things (MVCs) only happen to other people. (3) Thus, individuals with AD rarely relinquish their driving privileges voluntarily(8) and often cease driving only after being involved in an MVC.(9)

Caregivers frequently do not plan for driving cessation, and there is often a lag between the recognition of cognitive deficits on the part of the caregiver and the initiation of the driving cessation process.(10) This lag may be due to the caregivers’ lack of knowledge about dementia and its impact on driving or fear over increased burden of care if the affected individual can no longer drive.(11) Therefore, physicians are routinely responsible for initiating the driving cessation process by contacting the appropriate authorities. In Canada, reporting guidelines concerning fitness to drive vary by province and territory. All but three Canadian provinces mandate that physicians report potentially unsafe drivers to provincial licensing authorities;(12) however, national survey data indicate that many physicians, regardless of mandatory reporting, do not feel comfortable in assessing driving safety. (1315) The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) guidelines for the assessment of driving in dementia are designed to provide a unified physician approach to the assessment of dementia patients;(12) however, these guidelines does not offer conclusive answers for case-by-case usage, and there is no failsafe test to predict which individuals with dementia are at significant risk of MVC.(16)

In Nova Scotia, reporting of unsafe drivers is at the discretion of the physician. Physicians must therefore consider not only the underlying disease, but also the interest of the patient and family (many of whom reside in rural areas and are highly dependent on personal vehicles for transportation), the welfare of the community, medical ethics, and their own personal comfort and confidence in assessing fitness to drive.

This study sought to assess perceived barriers to addressing driving safety in dementia among Nova Scotian primary care physicians (PCPs) and to determine whether these barriers differ between urban and rural physicians or according to years of practice. Results will inform resource development and awareness campaigns promoting appropriately timed driving cessation.

METHODS

Study Design, Population, and Instrument

This cross-sectional study targeted Nova Scotian PCPs. For study inclusion, physicians surveyed were required to be English speaking with a practice in Nova Scotia that included patients with dementia.

Drawing upon published literature(13) an anonymous 33-item survey was developed with questions evaluating PCP demographics and general practice ( n = 7 questions), practices in evaluating fitness to drive ( n = 13), opinions regarding the assessment and reporting of fitness to drive ( n = 8), and resource use ( n = 6). The survey was reviewed by four geriatricians who provided feedback on content validity and readability prior to survey circulation.

Surveys ( n = 134) were distributed to PCPs attending a Canadian medical education refresher held in Halifax, Nova Scotia in 2008. An electronic version of the questionnaire (hosted on Dalhousie University’s Opinio Web server; Opinio version 5, Object Planet, Inc, Oslo, Norway) was distributed via email to a registry of approximately 700 PCPs practicing in Nova Scotia. As an incentive survey participants were asked to email their name and address to a generic email account for entry into a draw for a $100 gift card to a Nova Scotian gas station.

The institutional Research Ethics Board of the Capital District Health Authority in Halifax approved the study protocol. Implied consent was obtained; PCPs reviewed a cover letter describing the research and decided whether to complete and submit the survey.

Survey response data were examined using descriptive statistics and multivariate linear and logistic regression controlling for sex, community of practice, and years of practice. A cut-off value of p < .05 was used. All descriptive statistics reported are based on the number of responses obtained for each question.

RESULTS

Of the 159 surveys completed (79 paper, 80 electronically), 134 met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Surveys excluded were completed by physicians who did not practice in Nova Scotia ( n = 19) or did not treat patients with dementia ( n = 6). Physicians were primarily female (71, 53%), practicing in an urban community (77, 58%) with a mean ± SD of 17.9±11 years’ experience as a PCP.

Driving evaluations for patients with a diagnosis of dementia were typically considered to be a part of routine practice (95, 71%), with assessments most often being done on diagnosis (73, 55%) or by mild stage (42, 31%) and taking less than 30 minutes (124, 93%). Physicians reported referring patients for on-road assessment (94, 70%) and to other health care professionals (88, 66%), usually a geriatrician (66/88, 75%). Number of years of practice was associated with more lengthy discussions about driving cessation ( p = .03), and was positively associated with the probability both of having a routine discussion about driving and dementia ( p = .03) and of referring for an on-road assessment ( p = .02).

Some ( n = 17) physicians reported feeling comfortable in assessing driving safety (10, 59% male, 10, 59% rural). However, more than half of those surveyed (93, 69%) said they at least sometimes avoid discussions about driving cessation. Neither comfort in assessing driving safety nor avoidance of discussions was associated with type or years of practice. Table 1 lists which items physicians perceived to be a barrier to assessment. Concern about personal or corporate liability was most common, as indicated by 78% ( n = 105) of respondents.

TABLE 1   Primary care physicians’ perceived barriers to assessment of fitness to dive for patients with dementia

 

Table 2 lists assessment tools used by the PCPs. Physicians were instructed to select all of the tools they used to assess fitness to drive for patients with dementia and were given the opportunity to include items not listed. Almost all PCPs reported using the Mini-Mental State Examination(17) (MMSE) when assessing driving ability (124, 92%). Choice of assessment tool did not vary according to type or years of practice.

TABLE 2   Tools used by primary care physicians to assess fitness to drive for patients with dementia

 

Of those surveyed, 84% ( n = 112) were aware of the CMA guidelines for determining medical fitness to operate a motor vehicle. While 60% ( n = 80) reported using the guidelines in practice, only half of respondents rated it as useful (63, 47%). No association was found between use of the national guidelines and years of practice, sex, or type of practice. Few physicians (32, 24%) indicated that they used other resources regarding driving cessation in dementia (such as information from the Nova Scotia Registry of Motor Vehicles and the Alzheimer Society of Canada). When asked specifically, 97% ( n = 130) of respondents indicated their interest in accessing more education tools and resources such as a website regarding driving cessation in dementia.

DISCUSSION

Most respondents considered discussions about driving safety to be a part of the routine assessment of patients with dementia and recognized their role in reporting elderly drivers. The results of a recent American study examining physician attitudes and practice regarding fitness to drive for individuals with dementia are comparable with our findings that physicians with more years experience are more likely to routinely address driving issues.(18) Many of our respondents reported lack of familiarity with current guidelines as a barrier to assessing driving safety in dementia. Respondents also reported concerns about legal responsibility and the potential for jeopardizing relationships. Although concern about negative effects on patient–physician relationships was a common barrier to driving assessment in a national survey,(13) regardless of discretionary or mandatory reporting policies, our result may be in part related to Nova Scotia’s provincial discretionary reporting policy, whereby physicians are not obligated to report concerns about unsafe drivers to the Registry of Motor Vehicles. Interestingly, national data indicate that physicians in provinces with mandatory reporting are less likely to assess fitness to drive than those practicing under a discretionary reporting system, but are more likely to report unsafe drivers.(13)

Ultimately, until there is a reliable and validated office tool, PCPs will continue to face challenges in assessing fitness to drive in dementia. Our data indicate that PCPs in Nova Scotia rely most frequently on MMSE scores. Although it has been proposed that fitness to drive is not maintained once MMSE scores fall to ≤24,(1921) a recent meta-analysis found that MMSE scores are no more reliable than a simple driving knowledge test in predicting on-road driving performance (e.g., recognizing traffic signs) during driving assessments. (22) The clock draw test, less often used by Nova Scotian PCPs, has been shown to predict poor performance on driving simulators (overall prediction 90%).(23) However, these results have yet to be replicated and confirmed with on-road performance. Furthermore, while the American Academy of Neurology recently recommended using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale(24) combined with caregiver input, driving history, changes in driving behavior, an MMSE score ≤24, and aggressive behavior as useful for identifying patients at increased risk for unsafe driving,(20) the CDR is not often used by PCPs.(25)

Few respondents listed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)(26) as a tool they use to inform driving assessment. While screening tools for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) such as the MoCA are gaining popularity among general practitioners, there is no evidence supporting the use of the MoCA as an indicator of fitness to drive in MCI or dementia. In particular, the implications of a diagnosis of MCI for driving safety are not addressed by national guidelines. Further, the MoCA has variable specificity for the diagnosis of MCI and dementia,(2628) and research indicates that individuals with mild dementia may still drive safely.

Given the discomfort associated with addressing driving safety for patients with dementia, and the lack of a validated in-office assessment tool, it is not surprising that many physicians refer their patients either for additional assessment by another health care professional or for on-road assessment. The recently released Screen for the Identification of Cognitively Impaired Medically At-Risk Drivers, a Modification of the DemTec (SIMARD MD) tool(29)—a pen-and-paper test that evaluates memory, attention, judgment, and decision making— is being pilot tested in British Columbia. Unfortunately, at least one-half of patients tested will still need on-road evaluation due to an indeterminate result.

Our results must be interpreted with caution. Our sample size was small and response was voluntary. We do not have data regarding the practices of PCPs who did not complete the survey. However, our sample did include a variety of practice profiles in terms of urban compared with rural practice, practitioner’s sex, and number of years of practice, and our results are consistent with those of other studies of physician’s attitudes toward assessing fitness to drive for dementia, as well as the elderly in general.(1315,18,30,31)

CONCLUSION

Nova Scotian PCPs continue to report discomfort with assessing fitness to drive in dementia and are eager to access information and resources. In response to this identified gap in knowledge transfer, we partnered with the Canadian Dementia Knowledge Translation Network (www.lifeandminds.ca) to create an online educational resource for Nova Scotian physicians and caregivers of individuals with dementia (www.notifbutwhen.ca). The resource contains educational materials, assessment information, and tools for both physicians and caregivers to promote healthy driving cessation. Further study, following release and promotion of a provincially relevant online resource, will help clarify the impact of the resource on practice habits.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This project was funded by the Canadian Dementia Knowledge Translation Network and the Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (PSO 2008-4666).


Correspondence to: Paige Moorhouse, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, 1421-5955 Veterans’ Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS, B3H 2E1 Email: paige.moorhouse@cdha.nshealth.ca

REFERENCES

1  Rebok GW, Keyl PM, Bylsma FW, et al . The effects of Alzheimer disease on driving-related abilities. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1994;8:228–40.
cross-ref  pubmed  

2  Parasuraman R, Nestor P. Attention and driving: assessment in elderly individuals with dementia. Clin Geriatr Med 1993;9:377–87.
pubmed  

3  Adler G, Rottunda S, Dysken M. The older driver with dementia: an updated literature review. J Safety Res 2005;36:399–407.
cross-ref  pubmed  

4  Alzheimer Society of Canada. Rising tide: The impact of dementia on Canadian society [Internet]. Toronto: Alzheimer Society of Canada; 2010. Available from: http://www.alzheimer.ca/docs/RisingTide/Rising%20Tide_Full%20Report_Eng_FINAL_Secured%20version.pdf.
pmc  

5  Gilley DW, Wilson RS, Bennett DA, et al . Cessation of driving and unsafe motor vehicle operation by dementia patients. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:941–6.
cross-ref  pubmed  

6  Friedland RP, Koss E, Kumar A, et al . Motor vehicle crashes in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Ann Neurol 1988;24:782–6.
cross-ref  pubmed  

7  Ott BR, Lafleche G, Whelihan WM, et al . Impaired awareness of deficits in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1996;10:68–76.
cross-ref  pubmed  

8  Anstey KJ, Windsor TD, Luszcz MA, et al . Predicting driving cessation over 5 years in older adults: psychological well-being and cognitive competence are stronger predictors than physical health. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:121–6.
cross-ref  pubmed  

9  Jett K, Tappen RM, Rosselli M. Imposed versus involved: different strategies to effect driving cessation in cognitively impaired older adults. Geriatr Nurs 2005;26:111–6.
cross-ref  pubmed  

10  Cortell V, Wild K. Longitudinal study of self-imposed driving restrictions and deficit awareness in patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999;13:151–6.
cross-ref  

11  Perkinson MA, Berg-Weger ML, Carr DB, et al . Driving and dementia of the Alzheimer type: Beliefs and cessation strategies among stakeholders. Gerontologist 2005;45:676–85.
cross-ref  pubmed  

12  Canadian Medical Association. Determining medical fitness to operate motor vehicles: driver’s guide 7th edition. Section 4: Driving cessation [Internet]. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association; 2006 [cited 2008 Jan 28]. Available from: www.cma.ca/multimedia/CMA/Content_Images/Inside_cma/WhatWePublish/Drivers_Guide/Section04_e.pdf.
pubmed  pmc  

13  Jang RW, Man-Son-Hing M, Molnar FJ, et al . Family physicians’ attitudes and practices regarding assessments of medical fitness to drive in older persons. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:531–43.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

14  Miller DJ, Morley JE. Attitudes of physicians toward elderly drivers and driving policy. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:722–4.
pubmed  

15  Marshall SC, Gilbert N. Saskatchewan physicians’ attitudes and knowledge regarding assessment of medical fitness to drive. CMAJ 1999;160:1701–4.
pubmed  

16  Molnar FJ, Patel A, Marshall SC, et al . Clinical utility of officebased cognitive predictors of fitness to drive in persons with dementia: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:1809–24.
cross-ref  

17  Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.
cross-ref  pubmed  

18  Adler G, Rottunda SJ. The driver with dementia: a survey of physician attitudes, knowledge, and practice. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2011;26:58–64.
cross-ref  pubmed  

19  Fox GK, Bowden SC, Bashford GM, et al . Alzheimer’s disease and driving: prediction and assessment of driving performance. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:949–53.
pubmed  

20  Iverson DJ, Gronseth GS, Reger MA, et al ; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter update: evaluation and management of driving risk in dementia. Neurology 2010;74:1316–24.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

21  Adler G. Driving and dementia: dilemmas and decisions. Geriatrics 1997;52(Suppl 2):S26–9.
pubmed  

22  Mathias JL, Lucas LK. Cognitive predictors of unsafe driving in older drivers: a meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr 2009:21:637–53.
cross-ref  pubmed  

23  Freund B, Gravenstein S, Ferris R, et al . Drawing clocks and driving cars. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:240–4.
cross-ref  pubmed  

24  Morris JC. Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int Psychogeriatr 1997;9(Suppl 1):173–6; discussion 177–8.
cross-ref  pubmed  

25  Wagner JT, Muri RM, Nef T, et al . Cognition and driving in older persons. Swiss Med Wkly 2011;140:w13136.
pubmed  

26  Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695–9.
cross-ref  pubmed  

27  Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. Can J Psychiatry 2007;52:329–32.
pubmed  

28  Luis CA, Keegan AP, Mullan M. Cross validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community dwelling older adults residing in the southeastern US. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009;24:197–201.
cross-ref  

29  Dobbs BM, Schopflocher D. The introduction of a new screening tool for the identification of cognitively impaired medically at-risk drivers: the SIMARD, a modification of the DemTec. J Prim Care Community Health 2010;1:119–27.

30  Bogner HR, Straton JB, Gallo JJ, et al . The role of physicians in assessing older drivers: barriers, opportunities, and strategies. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004;17:38–43.
cross-ref  pubmed  

31  Cable G, Reisner M, Gerges S, et al . Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of geriatricians regarding patients with dementia who are potentially dangerous automobile drivers: a national survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:14–7.
pubmed  

32  Army Individual Test Battery: Manual of Directions and Scoring. Washington, DC: War Department, Adjutant General’s Office; 1944.

33  Brodaty H, Moore CM. The Clock Drawing Test for dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a comparison of three scoring methods in a memory disorders clinic. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997;12:619–27.
cross-ref  pubmed  


(Return to Top)


CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


Canadian Geriatrics Journal, Volume 14, Issue 3, September 2011

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 1925-8348 (Online)