Canadian Geriatrics Journal
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj
<p><em>The Canadian Geriatrics Journal </em>(CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.</p> <p>The CGJ is indexed/covered in PubMed, ProQuest, Crossref, and EBSCOhost.com Research Databases. Following publication in the <em>Canadian Geriatrics Journal</em>, the full text of each article is available immediately and archived in PubMed Central (PMC), the U.S. National Library of Medicine's digital archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature. <em> </em></p>Canadian Geriatrics Societyen-USCanadian Geriatrics Journal1925-8348<p>Authors contributing to the <em>Candian Geriatrics Journal</em> retain copyright of their work, with exclusive publication rights granted to the Canadian Geriatrics Society upon article acceptance. Read the journal's full <a href="https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/AboutCGJ#Copyright">copyright</a> and <a href="https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/AboutCGJ#OpenAccess">open access</a> policy. </p>Fall Risk Identification with Innovative Technologies for Aging in Place: A Clinical Needs Assessment Study
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/898
<p><strong>Background</strong> </p> <p>Falls are a leading cause of injury and loss of independence among older adults. While gait-monitoring technologies offer promise for early fall risk detection, adoption is hindered by usability, cost, and integration challenges. Few studies incorporate perspectives from both patients and providers to inform user-centred design.</p> <p><strong>Objective</strong> </p> <p>To identify barriers, facilitators, and design considerations for implementing gait-monitoring and fall-assessment technologies among older adults, caregivers, and healthcare providers.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> </p> <p>A qualitative needs assessment was conducted with older adults (≥65 years), caregivers, and healthcare providers in British Columbia, Canada. Participants were recruited via REACH BC, community organizations, and professional networks. Data collection included demographic surveys, standardized questionnaires (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), Fall Efficacy Scale), and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 12.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> </p> <p>Twenty-nine older adults/caregivers participated. Most reported slight-to-moderate functional limitations and high engagement in self-care. Four key themes emerged: (i) navigating health and fall prevention—proactive self- management but access barriers; (ii) embracing and questioning health technologies—interest tempered by complexity and perceived relevance; (iii) openness to gait monitoring and boundaries of trust—conditional acceptance, privacy concerns; (iv) designing for real lives—preferences for comfortable, discreet, affordable devices and integration into clinical workflows. Providers valued continuous data but cited cost, patient tech-readiness, and actionable output as critical.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong> </p> <p>Stakeholders expressed interest in gait-monitoring technologies that are affordable, discreet, easy to use, and respectful of autonomy. Aligning device design with both personal comfort and clinical utility, and addressing privacy and integration challenges, may improve adoption and support safe aging in place.</p>Titilola YakubuNooshin JafariMichael LimJamie LamMichelle LinDi JiangKendall Ho
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229314715510.5770/cgj.29.898Duty to Protect? The Troubling Pattern of Legislative Noncompliance and Missed Police Involvement in Ontario’s Long-Term Care Sector
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/930
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p>Ontario’s Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021 requires long-term care (LTC) licensees to immediately notify police of any alleged, suspected, or witnessed abuse, neglect, or other conduct that may constitute a criminal offence. This study examines compliance with mandatory police notification requirements using publicly available Ministry of Long-Term Care (MLTC) inspection reports.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>We conducted a qualitative analysis with descriptive quantitative summaries of MLTC inspection reports issued in 2024. A 20% random sample of Ontario LTC homes was selected, and all associated inspection reports (N = 457) were retrieved. Using predefined keywords (“abuse,” “neglect,” “police”), relevant reports were identified (n = 193) and analyzed thematically to examine legislative compliance, documentation of police involvement, and enforcement responses.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong></p> <p>Twenty-one of 193 reports (10.8%) mentioned police and were the focus of our analysis. In 16 of 21 reports, there were accounts of abuse and/or neglect, including theft, fraud, and physical and sexual assault, but police were only notified and dispatched to an LTC home in 2 of the 16 reports (12.5%). The remaining 14/16 cases (87.5%) involved incidents of resident-involved abuse or neglect where police were not contacted. Four of 21 reports (19%) involved noncompliance pertaining to required qualifications and missing or falsified police record checks. The final report cited a prior, second-hand account of police involvement for alleged resident aggression.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p> <p>This study provides the first review of compliance practices of LTC licensees in Ontario and their legal duty to report incidents of abuse, neglect, and other suspected criminal activity to police. Inconsistencies in documentation and variation in violations issued for comparable incidents suggest that these events are often addressed within regulatory or clinical frameworks, with limited documented engagement of criminal processes.</p>Vivian StamatopoulosShannon VettorEmily Hladkowicz
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229315617210.5770/cgj.29.930Barriers and Facilitators in Using Personal Hearing Amplifiers from the Perspective of Healthcare Providers
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/932
<p><strong>Background</strong> </p> <p>Hearing loss is experienced by two-thirds of hospitalized older adults and is associated with poor access to healthcare and negative health outcomes. Personal hearing amplifiers (PHAs) are evidence-based assistive devices provided in many hospitals to improve accessibility. However, studies note difficulties in implementing the appropriate use of PHAs. This study seeks to identify barriers and facilitators in using PHAs by healthcare providers in an academic hospital.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>An ethnographic interview protocol was developed and used to guide voluntary semi-structured interviews with 33 geriatricians, nurses and other allied health professionals, and patient-facing volunteers at Mount Sinai Hospital. The audio interviews were transcribed verbatim and a reflexive thematic analysis was performed. Finally, member checking was completed by sharing results with interviewees who consented to re-contacting and interest-holders within the hospital’s geriatrics program to receive feedback.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> </p> <p>Thematic analysis revealed that regardless of profession, PHAs were perceived as valuable yet underutilized. Under this overarching theme, three key themes were identified around PHA use: barriers to accessibility and availability, lack of designated responsibility, and lack of integration into clinical practice. These findings highlight both the facilitators and barriers associated with implementing PHAs.</p> <p><strong>Discussion</strong> </p> <p>PHAs are important accessibility tools, and this study has identified barriers and facilitators to their use by healthcare providers and volunteers communicating with patients with hearing loss. These findings lay the groundwork to test future interventions to promote the increased uptake of PHA devices and greater access to healthcare for older patients experiencing hearing loss.</p>Mansi A. AroraJanice XuKristina M. KokoreliasRaphaelle KoerberHamsa KrishnapillaiSamir K. Sinha
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229317317910.5770/cgj.29.932An Environmental Scan of Alternate Level of Care (ALC) Policies in Ontario, Canada
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/933
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p>Alternate level of care (ALC) patients occupy hospital beds despite no longer requiring acute services, impacting patient flow and contributing to overcrowding. Ontario hospitals have updated legislation and policies to address this issue, yet protocols vary across centres. This study conducted an environmental scan of ALC policies to examine differences in patient identification, management, and support.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>The research employed a multi-phase approach, beginning with a review of ALC policies obtained through direct inquiry from relevant institutions and publicly available documents. Policies were analyzed using content analysis to systematically identify common practices and differences across key areas, including risk identification, clinical criteria, leadership roles, early discharge planning, and patient engagement. A coding framework was developed based on Ontario Health guidelines and used as a comprehensive guiding document for comparison. Two researchers independently coded the documents to ensure consistency, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion to reach consensus. Key patterns and themes were then synthesized to highlight areas of convergence and divergence across the policies.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong></p> <p>Qualitative content analysis of 10 policy documents revealed consistency in the core definition of ALC patients but variability among clinical criteria, substitute decision-maker roles, caregiver supports, discharge-planning protocols, and language. Variability existed in the application of senior-friendly care principles, with emphasis on discharge rather than successful transitions, suggesting opportunities for improvement in person-centred care.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p> <p>ALC policies vary greatly and exhibit both strengths and gaps in addressing patient flow and care coordination. Comprehensive discharge-planning models, which maintain a person-centred approach, could help mitigate patient flow challenges without loss of senior-friendly care principles by strengthening caregiver engagement and standardizing ALC patient identification and management practices. These findings identify the need for a more cohesive and formalized ALC management strategy in Ontario, with implications for the development of national policies and protocols worldwide.</p>Diya AhmadAndrea PaceLaura JamiesonKristina M. Kokorelias Guillaume Lim Fat
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229318018810.5770/cgj.29.933Does Adding Mindfulness to Instability Resistance Training Enhance Dual-Task Mobility and Fall-Related Outcomes in Older Adults with Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome? A Randomized Controlled Trial
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/945
<p><strong>Background</strong> </p> <p>Older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) exhibit impairments in dual-task mobility. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as physical exercise and cognitive strategies, have been proposed to mitigate physical and cognitive decline. However, the effectiveness of combining these approaches remains unclear.</p> <p><strong>Objective</strong> </p> <p>To evaluate the effects of instability resistance training (IRT) performed with or without mindfulness on mobility under single- and dual-task conditions and fall- related outcomes in older adults with MCR.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> </p> <p>In this parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 56 community-dwelling older adults with MCR (≥65 years) were allocated to IRT or combined with mindfulness (IRT + Mind). Both groups trained twice weekly for 24 weeks. Primary outcomes included single- and dual-task Timed Up and Go (TUG). Secondary outcomes were dual-task cost, concern about falling (Falls Efficacy Scale–International), and balance confidence (Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale). Outcomes were analyzed using generalized mixed models.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> </p> <p>For single-task TUG, a significant main effect of time was observed (p < .001), with similar improvements in both groups (0.62–0.80 s). Dual-task TUG performance improved over time for both cognitive conditions, with significant group × time interactions favoring the IRT group (<em>p</em> ≤ .049). Dual-task cost did not change significantly. Balance confidence improved significantly over time in both groups (mean increase ≈14 points<em>; p</em> < .001), whereas concern about falling remained unchanged.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p> <p>IRT improved mobility and confidence in balance in older adults with MCR. The addition of mindfulness did not provide incremental benefits, suggesting that motor-based training alone is sufficient to promote functional gains in this population.</p>Gabriel de Amorim BatistaVinícius Yan Santos NascimentoBruno Remígio CavalcanteMateus Santos SilvaHigo Faraday Paraíso LeãoLaís Regina de Holanda SantosDayane Tays da SilvaMariana Ferreira de SouzaAna Carolina Rodarti PitanguiRodrigo Cappato De Araújo
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229318919910.5770/cgj.29.945Prevalence and Risk of Heart Failure Among Older Adults Experiencing Homelessness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/938
<p><strong>Background</strong> <br />Understanding the prevalence and risk of heart failure (HF) among older adults is crucial for informing the design and implementation of interventions and guiding equitable healthcare delivery.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to April 2025. We included studies of adults aged 50 years or older experiencing homelessness. Outcomes included HF prevalence, risk of HF, and HF mortality. Screening, extraction, and risk-of-bias assessments were completed in duplicate. Random effects meta-analysis using generalized linear mixed models was used to estimate the prevalence of HF. The risk and mortality of HF were analyzed using random effects models, with housed older adults serving as the comparator.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> </p> <p>Thirty-four studies with 573,697 individuals experiencing homelessness were included in this study (weighted mean age: 59.0 years, weighted female percentage: 19.9%). The prevalence of HF was 12.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3–19.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.9%). The odds of HF compared to housed adults (weighted mean age: 70.8 years) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.71–1.23; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.7%). The unadjusted odds of mortality from HF was 0.40 (95% CI 0.22–0.74; I<sup>2</sup> = 100%).</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong> <br />This meta-analysis suggests that older adults experiencing homelessness have a prevalence of HF similar to or higher than population-based studies of housed adults of a similar age. Housing status was not associated with the odds of HF and was associated with a decreased odds of mortality, although substantial heterogeneity across studies limits evidence certainty.</p>Peter M. HoangJosephine DingLaith AlmsariJeswende SeeduRiyad AsgaraliYu Qing HuangCharmaine De CastroPaula RochonMaurita HarrisKristina M. Kokorelias
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229320020810.5770/cgj.29.938Abstracts from the 12th Canadian Conference on Dementia
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/952
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229321127810.5770/cgj.29.952Abstracts from the 2026 Annual Scientific Meeting of the Canadian Geriatrics Society
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/962
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229327933310.5770/cgj.29.962The Need for a Fast-track Pathway to Streamline Disease-modifying Treatments in Early Alzheimer’s Disease
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/975
Durjoy Lahiri
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229320921010.5770/cgj.29.975Erratum: Association Between the Japanese Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tasks and Driving as the Primary Mode of Transport Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/991
<p><em>Correction to the original citation: </em>Nakajima Y, Onishi H, Mizukami Y, Okamoto T, Inoue T, Koujimoto A, Konoshita N, Tanaka T, Matsunaga A, Kubota M, Ikawa M, Hori H, Kobayashi Y, Hayashi H, Yamamura O. Association Between the Japanese Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tasks and Driving as the Primary Mode of Transport Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Can Geriatr J. 2026;29(2):88-94. (<strong>See DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.29.917">https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.29.917</a>)</p>Yuya NakajimaHidenori OnishiYasutaka MizukamiTomoko OkamotoTaisei InoueAkemi KoujimotoNaohiro KonoshitaTokuharu TanakaAkiko MatsunagaMasafumi KubotaMasamichi IkawaHideaki HoriYasutaka KobayashiHiroyuki HayashiOsamu Yamamura
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2026-09-022026-09-0229333433410.5770/cgj.29.991